Skip to main content

Table 1 Content of both generated mappings

From: Quantitative comparison of mapping methods between Human and Mammalian Phenotype Ontology

 

HP

MP

 

HP

% total

avg # mapped

MP

% total

avg # mapped

# concepts

10104

100%

-

8507

100%

-

# with formal definition

4860

48.10%

-

5389

63.35%

-

# mapped with lexical

2740

27.12%

7.17

1046

12.30%

6.97

# mapped with ontological

8184

80.10%

5.48

4446

52.26%

6.64

  1. Illustrates the numbers of concepts contained in each ontology but also incorporates the results of the mapping methods. % total: percentages calculated based on the total number of concepts in the ontology; avg # mapped: is the average number of concepts mapped to one particular concept in the ontology.
Back to article page

Journal of Biomedical Semantics

ISSN: 2041-1480