Skip to main content

Table 1 Content of both generated mappings

From: Quantitative comparison of mapping methods between Human and Mammalian Phenotype Ontology

  HP MP
  HP % total avg # mapped MP % total avg # mapped
# concepts 10104 100% - 8507 100% -
# with formal definition 4860 48.10% - 5389 63.35% -
# mapped with lexical 2740 27.12% 7.17 1046 12.30% 6.97
# mapped with ontological 8184 80.10% 5.48 4446 52.26% 6.64
  1. Illustrates the numbers of concepts contained in each ontology but also incorporates the results of the mapping methods. % total: percentages calculated based on the total number of concepts in the ontology; avg # mapped: is the average number of concepts mapped to one particular concept in the ontology.