From: BioBenchmark Toyama 2012: an evaluation of the performance of triple stores on biological data
Endpoint | case1 | case2 | case3 | case4 | case5 | case6 | case7 | case8 | case9 | case10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OWLIM-SE (ms) | 121 | 9 | 2740 | 5 | 149 | 1722 | 3 | 39 | 25 | 1 |
Virtuoso (ms) | 24 | 2 | 23280 | 3 | 42500 | 13073 | 5 | 7562 | 41 | 2 |
4store (ms) | 56 | 18 | 1236 | 13 | 33 | 64 | 22 | 67 | 2035 | 7 |
Bigdata (ms) | 282 | 35 | 3247 | 13 | 52 | 3320 | 11 | 93 | 47 | 10 |
Mulgara (ms) | 1294 | 20 | 2207 | 9 | 343 | 2325 | 32 | 58 | 33 | 4 |
Endpoint | case11 | case12 | case13 | case14 | case15 | case16 | case17 | case18 | case19 | Â |
OWLIM-SE (ms) | 6 | 47 | 2 | 1 | 52779 | 7 | 4 | 24 | 17 | Â |
Virtuoso (ms) | 120 | 19 | 5 | 1 | 56058 | 46 | 15 | 16 | 16721 | Â |
4store (ms) | 6 | 1563 | 8 | 7 | X | X | X | X | 15 | Â |
Bigdata (ms) | 20 | 27 | 5 | 6 | 18126 | X | X | X | 30 | Â |
Mulgara (ms) | 14 | X | 9 | 6 | X | X | X | X | 38 | Â |