Table 2 Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients between similarity value and difference in annotation size as well as between variance in similarity value and difference in annotation size
From: Evaluating the effect of annotation size on measures of semantic similarity
Similarity measure | Spearma | Pearson | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Yeast | Synthetic GO | Synthetic HPO | Yeast | Synthetic GO | Synthetic GO | ||||||
| Â | Average | Variance | Average | Variance | Average | Variance | Average | Variance | Average | Variance | Average | Variance |
GIC (Graph Information Content) | –0.895310 | –0.931818 | –0.999928 | –0.999784 | –0.999784 | –0.997835 | –0.875583 | –0.503795 | –0.964250 | –0.484246 | –0.963553 | –0.496135 |
NTO (Normalized Term Overlap) | 0.901443 | –0.233045 | 0.999784 | 0.961833 | 0.999784 | 0.959524 | 0.882986 | –0.192168 | 0.990210 | 0.848649 | 0.993038 | 0.849263 |
UI (Union Intersection) | –0.909524 | –0.924459 | –1.000000 | –0.658658 | –1.000000 | –0.518687 | –0.906605 | –0.596963 | –0.963476 | –0.547645 | –0.963569 | –0.508495 |
BMA with Jiang, Conrath 1997 | 0.283838 | –0.925830 | –0.902597 | –0.521861 | –0.891486 | –0.770130 | 0.074788 | –0.850654 | –0.834208 | –0.495874 | –0.848264 | –0.735985 |
BMA with Lin 1998 | 0.462843 | –0.674892 | –0.901587 | –0.552237 | –0.891126 | –0.731530 | 0.303157 | –0.707318 | –0.836486 | –0.517670 | –0.852998 | –0.693744 |
BMA with Resnik 1995 | 0.578211 | –0.579149 | –0.901587 | –0.537807 | –0.891126 | –0.699856 | 0.442458 | –0.487544 | –0.835991 | –0.507179 | –0.854007 | –0.670199 |
BMA with Schlicker 2006 | 0.462843 | –0.674892 | –0.901587 | –0.552237 | –0.891126 | –0.731530 | 0.303157 | –0.707318 | -0.836486 | –0.517670 | –0.852998 | –0.693744 |