Fig. 9
From: Identification of conclusive association entities in biomedical articles
Percentage of articles with CAEs ranked at top positions (i.e., %P@X > 0): For 92.46% of the articles, ALL-Abstract2 ranks at least one of their CAEs at top-2 positions. The percentage achieved by randomly ranking the entities (i.e., the Random baseline) is only 42.33%. ALL-Abstract2 also performs better than the best indicators noted in Figs. 1 and 7 (i.e., AvgTF, TFIDF, and ESe). It can thus be used to stably identify CAEs for most articles in practice