Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance comparison between the state of the art [4, 28] and this work in terms of precision (P), recall (R) and F-measure (F)

From: Syntax-based transfer learning for the task of biomedical relation extraction

Test corpus

Work (train corpus)

P

R

F

SNPPhena

[4] (SNPPhenA)

56.6

59.8

58.2

 

This work (SNPPhenA + SemEval 2013 DDI)

64.5

75.2

69.4

EU-ADR

[28] (EU-ADR drug-disease)

70.2

93.2

79.3

drug-disease

This work (EU-ADR drug-disease + SemEval 2013 DDI)

74.8

90.6

82.0

EU-ADR

[28] (EU-ADR drug-target)

74.2

97.4

83.3

drug-target

This work (EU-ADR drug-target + SemEval 2013 DDI)

73.5

95.6

83.1

EU-ADR

[28] (EU-ADR target-disease)

75.1

97.7

84.6

target-disease

This work (EU-ADR target-disease + SemEval 2013 DDI)

78.7

91.4

84.6

  1. Results reported for this work are ensembles of the 5 best models obtained. Bold numbers correspond to the best performing models