Table 1 Classification of the matching systems based on the classification model of [10]. The systems that were used in this study are AgreementMakerLight 2.0 [24], FCA-Map [25], and LogMap 2.0 [27]
From: Performance assessment of ontology matching systems for FAIR data
Agreement MakerLight 2.0 | FCA-Map | LogMap 2.0 | |
|---|---|---|---|
Element level | |||
Semantic: Formal resource-based | X | - | - |
Syntactic: Informal resource-based | - | - | - |
Syntactic: String-based | X | X | X |
Syntactic: Language-based | X | X | X |
Syntactic: Constraint-based | - | X | - |
Structure level | |||
Semantic: Model-based | - | X | X |
Syntactic: Instance-based | - | X | - |
Syntactic: Graph-based | - | - | X |
Syntactic: Taxonomy-based | - | - | X |