Table 3 Characterization of the associations between ATC and MeSH classes based on scores for equivalence and inclusion
From: A framework for assessing the consistency of drug classes across sources
ATC to MeSH | Best equivalence | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | >.5 | <.5 | Total | |
Best inclusion | >.5 | 148 (17%) | 580 (70%) | 728 (87%) |
<.5 | 1 (1%) | 99 (12%) | 100 (13%) | |
Total | 149 (18%) | 679 (82%) | 828 (100%) | |
MeSH to ATC | Best equivalence | |||
>.5 | <.5 | Total | ||
Best inclusion | >.5 | 120 (9%) | 390 (30%) | 510 (39%) |
<.5 | 45 (3%) | 762 (58%) | 807 (61%) | |
| Â | Total | 165 (12%) | 1,152 (88%) | 1,317 (100%) |