Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of the three ensemble methods regarding the number of labels predicted by each model

From: Large-scale online semantic indexing of biomedical articles via an ensemble of multi-label classification models

# of labels predicted from each model

 
 

MetaLabeler

SVM Tuned

SVM Vanilla

LLDA

Data set A

    

Improve micro-F

10751

15002

  

Improve F [13]

11256

14497

  

MULE

25192

561

  

Improve micro-F

19549

  

6204

Improve F [13]

15293

  

10460

MULE

25322

  

431

Improve micro-F

  

18862

6891

Improve F [13]

  

12900

12853

MULE

  

25702

51

Improve micro-F

 

8213

17037

503

Improve F [13]

 

8723

16351

679

MULE

 

25210

526

17

Improve micro-F

10066

2938

2499

250

Improve F [13]

10887

2815

11782

269

MULE

24814

174

760

5

Data set B

    

Improve micro-F

4252

12059

  

Improve F [13]

4699

11612

  

MULE

16053

258

  

Improve micro-F

9342

  

6969

Improve F [13]

10920

  

5391

MULE

15826

  

485

Improve micro-F

  

1500

14811

Improve F [13]

  

801

15510

MULE

  

15998

313

Improve micro-F

 

1804

12774

1733

Improve F [13]

 

1732

12688

1891

MULE

 

16121

38

152

Improve micro-F

3817

494

11331

669

Improve F [13]

4198

400

11053

660

MULE

15736

144

117

43

  1. The numbers are given for the micro-F optimization (first series of experiments)