Skip to main content

Table 6 Performance (in f-score) when using individual and combined sections for the prediction of the abstract labels. We show results from considering each section separately, i.e. Background (B), Objective (O), Methods (M), Results (R), and Conclusions (C), as well as combinations of the three best performing ones

From: Automatic classification of experimental models in biomedical literature to support searching for alternative methods to animal experiments

 

none

B

O

M

R

C

BM

BC

MC

BMC

invertebrates

0.95

0.95

0.76

0.89

0.95

0.95

1.00

0.84

0.82

0.95

in_vivo

0.88

0.76

0.75

0.86

0.83

0.79

0.83

0.70

0.80

0.83

human

0.86

0.90

0.62

0.78

0.67

0.70

0.78

0.78

0.73

0.80

organs

0.82

0.71

0.53

0.75

0.63

0.67

0.74

0.59

0.53

0.75

primary_cells

0.75

0.40

0.44

0.50

0.29

0.67

0.57

0.25

0.00

0.86

immortal_cell_lines

0.83

1.00

0.50

0.40

0.36

0.91

0.83

0.75

0.44

0.91

in_silico

0.75

0.67

0.67

0.60

0.80

0.67

0.75

0.80

0.83

0.67

others

0.78

0.73

0.56

0.48

0.40

0.64

0.64

0.73

0.67

0.70

All (average)

0.83

0.76

0.60

0.66

0.62

0.75

0.77

0.68

0.60

0.81